Analysis: Six key takeaways from the Qatar World Cup


A World Cup like no different wraps up with a closing like no different, a footballing story for the ages and the primary event for a area usually solely talked about within the damaging. What have we discovered? What has FIFA discovered? What has soccer discovered? Here are my key takeaways from the final month:

Lionel Messi, the best

Or one of many three biggest, at the very least, alongside his fellow Argentinian Diego Maradona and the Brazilian Pele. A scriptwriter couldn’t have give you a greater story – or a greater conclusion. The sporting troubles the Argentinian genius has needed to overcome, the loss within the 2014 World Cup closing, the sense that Argentina had by no means absolutely taken to him as they needed to Maradona.

Then, the redemption. The transformation of Messi previously few years into the chief of this group, the pilgrimage of tens of hundreds of Argentinians midway the world over to Doha, and the sense of the inevitable because the event progressed. And but, in these closing minutes of standard time on Sunday, Argentina collapsed. They appeared poised to steal defeat from the jaws of victory, solely to in some way emerge victorious. One of the game’s greatest-ever gamers fulfilled his future within the World Cup’s greatest-ever closing.

Arabs can host a World Cup

The questions over whether or not Qatar had the footballing gravitas and custom to carry the World Cup are well-trodden now.

However, the message the Qataris tried to place ahead from the beginning was that this could be a regional event and one that might characterize the entire Arab world.

Regional variations, significantly the blockade of Qatar, dampened that narrative initially. But the rapprochement between Qatar and its neighbours, in addition to the truth that Doha is really a world metropolis, with folks from throughout the Arab world, Asia, Africa and sure, Europe, calling it home, meant that the fears over a scarcity of environment have been all the time overblown. There was by no means going to be any want for ‘fake fans’, regardless of the makes an attempt by some respected media organisations to border followers from South Asia as such.

Other considerations, reminiscent of the shortage of alcohol at video games, additionally mirrored a selected Western view on how soccer must be loved, ignoring that, for many individuals, together with girls and households, the shortage of free-flowing beer made match attendance much more pleasant, and secure.

So was the fear-mongering warranted? And if it was not, do the folks and organisations who participated in it have inquiries to reply about their very own motives in framing it that manner?

Qatar received the appropriate to host the event, and the remainder of the area embraced the occasion as their very own. Why couldn’t everybody else settle for that?

This is the world’s sport

Football is a worldwide sport, however its tradition has lengthy been dominated by Europe, and to a lesser extent, South America.

Having the World Cup within the Middle East allowed folks from the area to have a event which they may attend and never really feel international. It allowed individuals who merely wouldn’t have been in a position to travel to the West for a World Cup – for monetary, cultural, or visa causes – to witness the game’s marquee occasion.

And they did. Moroccan and Saudi followers lit up this event in a manner that merely couldn’t have occurred elsewhere. There have been vital contingents from Africa and Asia, too. When will we be capable to see this many Indian followers at a World Cup once more?

For one month, Doha changed into a gathering place for the world. Japanese and Saudis sat at meals courts collectively, and Mexicans chanted with Ghanaians and Americans. Argentinians arrived on what should have felt like a shared nationwide journey, to a faraway land, and took it of their stride.

European followers, in fact, didn’t travel of their ordinary numbers. That is a disgrace: Their presence would have been the icing on the cake of what has been an ideal event.

The expertise at this World Cup was, I’m certain, totally different for various units of followers. Some folks can have most popular parts of this event to earlier ones. Others could have favored earlier editions higher. We are all totally different, with totally different opinions, totally different preferences and totally different values.

No one dimension matches all. Normal for some is irregular for others. And that’s the level: A really world sport should embrace variations.

Africa (and Asia) rising

Led by a cost from Africa and spirited performances from Asian and North American groups, soccer’s conventional elite has been challenged lately.

But this event actually felt like a signpost.

Morocco grew to become the primary African and Arab group to reach a World Cup semifinal, and have been, together with Messi, the story of the event. Being inside a stadium with their followers was a spotlight of the event for many individuals. Their gamers shone, however they weren’t a group of plucky upstarts. This is a group that included Achraf Hakimi of Paris Saint-Germain, Hakim Ziyech of Chelsea and Yassine Bounou of Sevilla.

Every African group received a sport, together with towards Brazil, France and Belgium. Japan beat Germany and Spain. South Korea beat Portugal. Argentina had a profitable streak going again to 2019 damaged by Saudi Arabia.

This is the way it must be, and the way, inevitably, it should proceed. A really world sport, the place anybody can win.

The line between sports activities, politics and human rights

In the run-up to the World Cup, Qatar was criticised for its therapy of migrant employees and LGBTQ+ folks. The debate over these points highlights the difficulties governing physique FIFA has going ahead if it desires to proceed its coverage of making an attempt to globalise soccer.

Qatar has acknowledged the validity of among the criticisms, following reviews of the deaths of labourers engaged on World Cup infrastructure and mistreatment. It says that modifications have been made, and can proceed to be, significantly in relation to security.

But many individuals in Qatar, the broader area and past felt that the considerations raised within the West reeked of hypocrisy, Orientalist stereotypes or outright racism.

No earlier host has confronted the scrutiny Qatar has, together with Russia, which was bombing Syria and invading Ukraine within the run-up to internet hosting the final World Cup.

But therein lies the issue for FIFA. Where is the road on human rights? Who will get to find out it? And by what requirements? ‘Universal’ human rights within the Western sense are oftentimes not accepted elsewhere. Does that mechanically rule out a lot of the world from internet hosting what is meant to be a worldwide sport?

What concerning the human rights of Palestinians, whose flag was a distinguished presence in Qatar in ways in which may not have been potential at different tournaments?

As the first host of the following World Cup, will the United States now face additional criticisms of its home and international insurance policies?

It can be nice for FIFA if the World Cup may travel around the globe each 4 years and but concurrently happen in a magical and sanitised ‘FIFAland’, the place none of those points exist.

Unfortunately for them, the World Cup takes place in the true world – and which means questions over how such world sporting occasions ought to deal with politics should not going to go away.

Changes to custom

Among the secondary criticisms of this event have been the modifications that it compelled upon the standard footballing calendar, and the logistical capability of the host to drag off sport’s largest spectacle.

Once it grew to become clear that it could be far too sizzling to host a sporting event within the Gulf summer season, the decision was made to move it to the winter – bang in the course of the European footballing calendar.

Yet, whereas this did disrupt the membership season, fears that this could harm the event by no means made sense: A mid-season World Cup would certainly imply fitter gamers and subsequently higher video games.

Qatar is certainly the smallest nation to have hosted the World Cup. But worries that the nation wouldn’t be capable to host tens of millions of additional visitors unexpectedly have by and enormous not been realised.

None of because of this a winter World Cup is essentially higher than a summer season event.

But the dam has damaged. It’s now clear that breaking custom doesn’t essentially break the game or the occasion, and it is going to be far simpler for FIFA to make modifications sooner or later.