Islamabad:
A constitutional bench of the Supreme Court withdrew the orders of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah January 13 and 16.
The constitutional bench adjourned the hearing indefinitely, issuing an order to connect the Nazar Abbas contempt of court case with the customs duty case.
According to Express News, a customs duty case was heard before a seven -member constitutional bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, in which the Attorney General said that the government has decided to challenge the decision of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s contempt of court case.
The Attorney General said that the last day’s contempt of court would file an appeal. Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s January 13 and 16 orders have been reviewed.
Also read this news: Government decides to challenge the order of Justice Mansoor’s full court
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked during the hearing that Justice Mansoor Ali Shah had ordered the customs duty case to be set up in his bench. Can you move forward in the presence of this order?
The worry of the freedom of the judiciary is not just a few, Justice Jamal Mandokhel
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that not just a few concerns about the independence of the judiciary. Do what you do. Which resurrection came, this is also the court. There is no trust in life. The Supreme Court and the courts have to stay. We have to take care of our organization. Don’t worry, this institution has nothing to do.
Justice Aminuddin Khan remarked that a ruling in the case was also on February 7, 2021 during the period of Bandial Sahib.
Strangely, the case said in the order, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said that it was strange that the case said in the January 16 order, the case should be heard. Or the case is heard or not heard. Where did the term be understood?
Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan said, “I have 2 decrees on January 13. The next date of the case stated in a decree is January 27. The next date of the case stated in the second order is January 16. The date of the case was changed in the decree.
Read more: The collision between the judges of the constitutional and regular benchs increased
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked that the case should be considered to be heard without giving the notice of Rule 27A to the Attorney General.
Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel said, “Did we issue a contempt of court notice to the regular bench?” But we just heard the case.
Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan said that yesterday’s decision said the case should be fixed for hearing before the same bench. False or right but judicial order, can we hear the case here?
The Attorney General said that we are going to challenge the decree of the 2 -member bench of January 13 and January 16 under Article 191 of Article 191.
Barrister Salahuddin said that we also have confidence in the decisions of the judges committees, and also confidence in the judicial order. Judges committees and a two -member bench judges should not sit in the review bench. To which Justice Aminuddin Khan said that it would be a matter of time when the review would come.
Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan remarked that we will not go to the merits.
If this cannot happen if your turn comes, the Constitution should be lifted and thrown out. Justice Aminuddin Khan
Justice Aminuddin Khan remarked that this cannot happen. Someone says that I am being hit by a wall, I was cruel to me. When your turn comes, the Constitution should be lifted and thrown out.
Orders of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s January 13 and 16
During the hearing, the constitutional bench withdrew the orders of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah January 13 and 16. Justice Mansoor Ali Shah issued notices on January 13 regarding the interpretation of Article 191A.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Barrister Salahuddin bitter
During the hearing, bitter sentences were exchanged between Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Barrister Salahuddin. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said, “I am getting an impression that you are not serious here, to which Barrister Salahuddin replied that if you raise questions about my reputation, I will give a strong answer.”
Justice Aminuddin Khan said that the matter was going somewhere else, not let it go. Barrister Salahuddin said that Justice Jamal said that we are not moving the case here yet. Either you have to run a case on merit, then I argue here.
Justice Jamal Mandokhel remarked that no file is now closed, we are seeking help from you to understand ourselves. To which Barrister Salahuddin replied that if the file was closed then you should ask questions on assumptions, I would answer the assumptions.
Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel is more dear to the judiciary more than me
Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel remarked during the hearing that no one loved the freedom of the judiciary than me. Suppose all judges are nominated by the Judicial Commission tomorrow, will the objection to the 26th Amendment will be abolished?
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said that the decision of the two -member bench would make the judicial staff fearful in providing administrative support.
Justice Mansoor continues to send constitutional matters to the constitutional bench, Justice Naeem Afghan
Justice Naeem Afghan while talking to lawyer Salahuddin said that by the order of a judicial bench of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah on January 13, it seems that you are responsible. Now you are not ready to run the results. Justice Mansoor Ali Shah once said that if all the cases go to the constitutional bench, what will we do but Mansoor Ali Shah himself has been sending the constitutional matters to the constitutional bench.
The hearing adjourned for an indefinite period
Later, the Constitutional Bench adjourned the hearing indefinitely, ordering the Nazar Abbas contempt case to be connected to the Customs Duty case.
