An EU price range summit ended with out settlement on Friday following a stand-off between rich “frugal” member states and different international locations.
The so-called “frugal four” of Denmark, Austria, Sweden and the Netherlands stated they might not settle for a price range of greater than 1% of the bloc’s GDP.
France’s Emmanuel Macron stated it confirmed “we don’t need Britain to show disunity”.
Brexit has left a €75bn ($81bn; £63bn) hole within the seven-year price range.
The UK was a internet contributor to the EU.
The EU’s present price range framework runs to the tip of this 12 months, so the brand new one will cowl the interval from 2021 to 2027.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel admitted that the talks had been damaged off as a result of “differences are too big”, however warned: “We are going to have to return to the subject.”
Mr Macron in the meantime criticised international locations for “forming blocking coalitions”.
Both the frugal 4 and internet beneficiary international locations – 17 member states together with Spain, Portugal, Greece, Poland and Hungary dubbed the “friends of cohesion” – rejected summit chairman Charles Michel’s compromise proposal, which might have capped joint spending at 1.069% of joint GDP.
That was barely lower than his unique proposal of 1.074%, equal to €1.09 trillion.
But internet beneficiary international locations needed greater than 1.074% whereas the frugal 4 needed a most of 1%.
The BBC’s World Service economics correspondent Andrew Walker says the scale of the EU price range issues loads to EU leaders, financially and in addition politically.
They need to have the ability to declare to the viewers at home that they’ve achieved their goals and taken care of their nationwide monetary pursuits, our correspondent says.
There can also be disagreement about how the price range can be spent.
The frugal international locations need extra spending on borders following the 2015-6 migrant disaster, local weather change, safety and digitisation.
Beneficiary jap and southern international locations need spending on “cohesion funds” – cash for poorer areas – and subsidies for farmers, which can also be supported by France, Ireland and others.
Mr Michel’s compromise deal preserved rebates for internet contributors reminiscent of Germany, included barely extra cash for agriculture to appease France and elevated the share of spending on local weather change to 27% – however was nonetheless rejected.
However, Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz stated there had been “good discussion” and “movement in the right direction”, including that two or three summits had been normally wanted to agree a price range.
Mr Michel will now seek the advice of member states over a date for a brand new summit. If no deal is reached by the tip of the 12 months the EU should put initiatives on maintain.