Facebook removes ‘overseas interference’ operations from Iran and Russia

A collection of samples provided by Facebook of the content posted by the two operationsImage copyright FACEBOOK
Image caption Facebook mentioned each operations acted “on behalf of a government or foreign actor”

Facebook has eliminated two separate networks of faux accounts originating in Iran and Russia, for “engaging in foreign or government interference”. 

The Russian operation, which Facebook linked to the nation’s army intelligence companies, centered totally on Ukraine and neighbouring nations.

The small Iranian operation used accounts and personas on Facebook and Instagram to submit content material about US politics and the 2020 presidential election.

Both operations tried to immediately contact politicians, public figures and journalists, a tactic utilized by a number of different info operations prior to now. 

Nathaniel Gleicher, head of Facebook’s safety coverage, mentioned in a weblog submit that each operations had been eliminated for violating the corporate’s “coordinated inauthentic behaviour” coverage, not their content material. 

The social community defines the coverage as “when groups of pages or people work together to mislead others about who they are or what they are doing”.

‘Intelligence operation’

The Russian community used dozens of faux personas to submit pro-Kremlin and anti-Western messages on Facebook, Twitter, blogs and information web sites.

It centered totally on Ukraine, however a few of Russia’s neighbouring nations, similar to Moldova, the Baltic states and Turkey, had been additionally focused. A number of accounts additionally centered on Germany and the UK, however “left little trace of online activity”, in accordance with Graphika, a social media analytics agency.

The messaging pushed by the community echoed among the key Kremlin media speaking factors, together with assaults on the White Helmets volunteers in Syria and pro-Western politicians in Ukraine, in addition to speak of perceived Russophobia within the West.

Image copyright AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Image caption With the 2020 US election approaching, Facebook is beneath stress to curb the unfold of disinformation on its platforms

In whole, 78 Facebook accounts, 11 pages, 29 teams and 4 Instagram accounts have been eliminated. Much of their exercise goes again to 2016-2018, however among the accounts had been nonetheless lively on the time of the takedown.

According to Graphika, blogs fashioned “the backbone” of the community, with operators utilizing faux accounts on Facebook and Twitter to focus on chosen audiences with long-form weblog posts.

Mr Gleicher defined that among the faux accounts posed as citizen journalists and “tried to contact policymakers, journalists and other public figures”.

“The operators picked their targets with care, and took pains to create realistic-looking accounts, many of which had unique profile pictures, rather than images copied from elsewhere online,” Graphika mentioned.

But not less than one of many focused people denies ever being in contact with the faux accounts.

Eskender Bariev, a member of a Crimean Tatar governing physique which opposes the Crimea annexation, was allegedly “entrapped” by a faux account posing as a journalist into making divisive feedback in a Facebook correspondence.

Image copyright FACEBOOK
Image caption This Russian account posed as a journalist on the US-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty

But Mr Bariev himself informed Radio Liberty’s Krym.Realii web site that he had had “no correspondence in the said period of time” and that his responses to questions differed from his standard type.

Ben Nimmo, director of investigations at Graphika, informed the BBC that the Russian community’s “overall reach was very limited”, however their operators nonetheless managed “to plant some of their stories on genuine news sites in Ukraine and Moldova”.

“It’s a classic approach for an intelligence operation: establish a false persona, then poison the well of information,” he added in a tweet.

You can also be fascinated with:


The Iranian operation was a lot smaller, when it comes to measurement and scale. Consisting of six Facebook and 5 Instagram accounts, the community solely managed to realize 60 followers on Instagram.

Facebook mentioned it was in a position to spot the community, because it demonstrated hyperlinks to a a lot bigger operation originating from Iran which it had taken down final yr.   

FireEye, a US cyber-security agency which was given prior entry to among the content material posted by the community, mentioned in a weblog submit that personas within the community posed as US liberals and amplified content material “directly in line with Iranian political interests”.

The agency additionally noticed a community of beneath 40 accounts on Twitter, which in some instances confirmed “direct overlap” with the accounts on Facebook and Instagram.

In one case, a persona utilizing the identify “Ryan Jensen” posted the identical video of an anti-war protest to Instagram and Twitter following the US assassination of Iran’s high common Qasem Soleimani.

Image copyright InSTAGRAM
Image caption This US anti-war protest video was posted after the killing of Iran’s high common Qasem Soleimani

The accounts on Twitter always replied to tweets by members of the US Congress, journalists and media shops, usually utilizing the identical hashtags.

The personas had been notable for his or her poor use of English, and likewise the actual fact a easy search would reveal that none of them had been journalists or media personalities.

“This was not a new type of activity, but it shows continuity in terms of the narrative and using commentary from authentic figures,” Lee Foster, info operations intelligence analyst at FireEye, informed the BBC.

“It’s not surprising that this was a small operation. If you are pretending to be journalists soliciting interviews from public figures, you probably don’t need hundreds of accounts.”

Much just like the Russian operation, the accounts “picked their targets individually and engaged them personally”, Mr Nimmo mentioned.

“There’s much more to online disinformation and propaganda efforts than trolling and fake media reports. Politicians and journalists need to be aware that they’re targets, and be wary.”