The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched an investigation into pretend and deceptive evaluations on a number of main web sites.
It mentioned it will look at whether or not on-line outlets had been “doing enough” to guard prospects as they flip to on-line procuring throughout lockdown.
The authority warned it will “not hesitate” to take motion if websites are disobeying the legislation.
That may embody taking main retailers to court docket.
“During lockdown, we’re more dependent than ever on online shopping, so it’s really important that the online reviews we read are genuine opinions,” mentioned CMA chief government Andrea Coscelli.
“If someone is persuaded to buy something after reading a fake or misleading review, they could end up wasting their money on a product or service that wasn’t what they wanted.”
But pretend and deceptive evaluations are unlawful beneath shopper safety legislation – which bans merchants from pretending to be shoppers of their very own merchandise, for instance. The CMA holds web sites chargeable for adhering to the rules.
Last yr the CMA estimated that estimated that on-line evaluations doubtlessly affect £23bn ($28bn) of UK buyer spending yearly.
- TripAdvisor defends itself in pretend evaluations row
- Amazon ‘flooded by pretend five-star evaluations’
The new investigation will cowl areas reminiscent of:
- suspicious evaluations, the place one particular person has reviewed “an unlikely range” of merchandise
- if companies are manipulating evaluations – eg by combining good evaluations for a number of merchandise collectively
- paid-for evaluations, and the way they’re dealt with by web sites.
The CMA declined to call the precise web sites it was investigating, however highlighted earlier discussions with Facebook, eBay and Instagram on the subject.
It mentioned Instagram had dedicated to tackling the marketplace for pretend evaluations on its platform.
The CMA had additionally discovered the shopping for and promoting of faux evaluations in Facebook teams and on eBay.
The regulator mentioned it was “not currently alleging that any website has acted illegally” – however would title and disgrace web sites later if it needed to take enforcement motion towards them.
Last yr, the buyer group Which? mentioned that within the house of a single month, it had discovered 55,000 posts providing free merchandise to those that wrote good evaluations on Amazon.
“It is good to see the regulator turning its attention to review sites,” a spokeswoman for Which? mentioned.
It mentioned on-line platforms wanted to take duty for the issue.
“We are providing further evidence to the CMA that we hope will prove useful in the next phase of its investigation – and we expect the regulator to take appropriate action against platforms found to be falling short in their responsibilities to protect consumers.”