Islamabad:
Defense Ministry’s lawyer Khwaja Haris completed the arguments on intra -court appeals against the decision to revoke the military trial of ordinary citizens involved in the May 9 incident in the Supreme Court, while Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi inquired in the past GHQ and Mehran Airbase. As sensitive places were also attacked.
The 21st Amendment decision stated that 16,000 different sensitive places were attacked from 2002 to the amendment, in such cases the testimony of the personnel was destroyed, in one incident destroyed two o’en aircraft which caused the loss of billions of rupees to the national exchequer. The severity was not high.
A seven -member constitutional bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan heard. Defense Ministry’s lawyer Khwaja Haris argued that the courts in the constitution are mentioned in Article 175, military courts are made under separate law which is recognized.
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said, “My words created a confusion yesterday, the media is not worried but some retired judges contacted, I want to explain yesterday not the judges mentioned the judges, I wanted to say.” Two people say the decision of the eight judges at a concert that it is so, some media colleagues wrongly reported it.
What does Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar give the remark to the Nexus, one means to be involved with the alliance, the relationship, the conspiracy or the spy, the second definition may be that a crime that is related to the army.
Khwaja Haris said that Naxes means disrupting the Work of Defense. Justice Masrat Hilali said that the definition of the Defense of Defense can be taken and taken anywhere.
Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi gave remarks that I had asked you a question earlier, in the past there were also attacks on sensitive places like GHQ and Mehran Air Base. Thousands of different sensitive places were attacked, personnel were martyred in such incidents, in one incident, two Orion aircraft were destroyed which caused the loss of billions of rupees to the national exchequer, was not the severity of these incidents, the trial of all such incidents. The courts or in the courts of anti -terrorism.
Khawaja Haris said the GHQ attack case was tried in the military courts. Justice Jamal Mandokhel asked if the trial took place before the 21st Amendment. Additional Attorney General Aamir Rehman said the GHQ attack trial was run before the 21st Amendment. Gone. Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that this objection could come from the other side.
The lawyer said, “We have never objected to the officers who have made the court martial. Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan said why the court, which gave the civilians into military custody, did not challenge the decision in the High Court under Article 199.
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that the trial of the murder of civilian by the Rangers in Karachi and Turbat went to civil courts. The lawyer said that when the Army Act is applied, basic rights are suspended, Indian spy Kulbhushan Yadav was given the right to appeal to the High Court by making law, ordinary citizens have not received this right. The hearing of the case has been postponed till date.
