Rawalpindi:
The founding chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and former prime minister Imran Khan reacted to X after being sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment with hard labor and a fine in a corruption case by the accountability court of Islamabad.
In a statement on the social networking website X, Imran Khan told his workers that first of all, you should not panic.
He wrote that I will never accept this dictatorship and in the struggle against this dictatorship I will have to stay in the prison cell for as long as possible.
Also read: Imran Khan sentenced to 14 years, Bushra Bibi 7 years of hard labor; 190 million pounds case was decided
Imran Khan said that I will not compromise on my principles and the struggle for real freedom of the nation, our commitment is real freedom and democracy. Which will be fought till the last ball, will not do any deal and will face all false cases.
Earlier, the Accountability Court of Islamabad has sentenced former Prime Minister Imran Khan to 14 years in prison with hard labor and a fine of 1 million in the 190 million pound case, and also ordered Al-Qadir Trust and University to be taken into official custody.
Accountability Court judge Nasir Javed Rana has sentenced Imran Khan’s wife to 7 years imprisonment and a fine of 5 lakh rupees for aiding and abetting corruption and after the verdict, she was detained in jail.
‘The history of 1971 is repeating itself in the country’
PTI founder said in his statement released on social media after the punishment by the accountability court I once again ask the nation to read the Hamudur Rehman Commission report, the history of 1971 is repeating itself in Pakistan, Yahya Khan also destroyed the country and even today the dictator is still there to save his dictatorship and for his personal gain. All this is doing and has brought the country to the brink of destruction.
He said that after the black judgment of Aj-ul-Qadir Trust, the judiciary has further destroyed its reputation, the judge who supports the dictatorship and follows the signals is rewarded and the names of the judges for the Islamabad High Court. The only merit they have sent is to give judgments against me.
The PTI founder said that this case should have been against Nawaz Sharif and his son, who sold their property of 9 billion in the UK. 18 Sold in billions, the question should be where did they get 9 billion from?
“I have not benefited from Al-Qadir University or the government has suffered a single cent”
He said that the receipts that were asked from him in Panama were not given till date, the money laundering of billions of rupees in Hudaybiya Paper Mills was waived, while Al Qadir University, like Shaukat Khanum and Namal University, is a free charity for the public. It is an institution where students learn the Prophet’s biography ﷺ K about i Education get do stay were
Imran Khan said that The Qadir oneNeither I nor Bishri Bibi benefited even from the university and the government did not lose even a single penny, the land of Al-Qadir Trust was also taken back, which will only harm the poor students who are Sirat-ul-Nabi. ﷺ K about i Education get do stay were
He said thatThere is a decision of Al-Qadir Trust which everyone already knew, whether there is a delay in the decision or the talk of punishment, everything is already in the media. In the history of the court, such a joke has never been seen, who wrote the decision to the judge. He sent it to the media.
He said that my wife is a housewife who has nothing to do with politics, Bashri Bibi was punished only to put pressure on me by hurting me.
The PTI founder said that there were frivolous cases made against him earlier too, but Bishri Bibi has always fought it as a test from Allah and has stood by my cause.
The former prime minister further said in the statement that if there is no progress in the negotiations on forming the judicial commission on May 9 and November 26, then there is no point in wasting time.
He said that dishonest people Never allowing neutral umpires, the government is evading the judicial commission’s demand because it is dishonest.
