J.Ok. Rowling is once more dealing with allegations of transphobia. Here's what sparked it this time round.

55

View images

J.Ok. Rowling is seen accepting an award onstage through the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Hosts 2019 Ripple Of Hope Gala & Auction In NYC on December 12, 2019. Now she’s once more below hearth for alleged transphobia. (Photo: Bennett Raglin/Getty Images for for Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights)

J.Ok. Rowling is in scorching water once more.

View images

J.Ok. Rowling’s newest guide, Troubled Blood, written below pseudonym Robert Galbraith, is pictured outdoors of a bookstore in London. Its plot, a couple of cross-dressing serial killer, is sparking backlash. (Photo: REUTERS/Peter Nicholls)

Telegraph. “One wonders what critics of Rowling’s stance on trans issues will make of a book whose moral seems to be: Never trust a man in a dress.”” data-reactid=”54″>“The meat of the book is the investigation into a cold case: the disappearance of GP Margot Bamborough in 1974, thought to have been a victim of Dennis Creed, a transvestite serial killer,” wrote reviewer Jake Kerridge within the Telegraph. “One wonders what critics of Rowling’s stance on trans issues will make of a book whose moral seems to be: Never trust a man in a dress.”

trope of the transgender serial killer (á la Psycho, Dressed to Kill, Silence of the Lambs and more) in her new book, but for doing so on the heels of her most recent public row about transgender identity, which is being viewed by her critics as a bizarre doubling down.” data-reactid=”61″>The response, thus far, has been destructive, with “#RIPJKRowling” trending on Twitter, as she’s known as out with a mixture of anger and exasperation — not just for utilizing the well-worn and damaging trope of the transgender serial killer (á la Psycho, Dressed to Kill, Silence of the Lambs and extra) in her new guide, however for doing so on the heels of her most up-to-date public row about transgender identification, which is being seen by her critics as a weird doubling down.

sparked accusations of transphobia back in December 2019, when she tweeted in defense of a U.K. researcher, Maya Forstater, who had lost her job after expressing views on transgender people — including the belief that “it is impossible to change sex” — that were deemed “not worthy of respect in a democratic society.” After the woman filed a discrimination lawsuit and lost, Rowling came to her defense on Twitter, noting, “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like … But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?” ” data-reactid=”66″>Rowling sparked accusations of transphobia again in December 2019, when she tweeted in protection of a U.Ok. researcher, Maya Forstater, who had misplaced her job after expressing views on transgender individuals — together with the idea that “it is impossible to change sex” — that have been deemed “not worthy of respect in a democratic society.” After the lady filed a discrimination lawsuit and misplaced, Rowling got here to her protection on Twitter, noting, “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like … But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?” 

noting, “YOU ARE AMAZING.”” data-reactid=”69″>That prompted an enormous uproar amongst many within the LGBTQ neighborhood, who known as her feedback every little thing from “heartbreaking” to “TERF.” The latter is an acronym that stands for “trans-exclusionary radical feminist,” a pejorative time period used to explain a feminist who is taken into account to have transphobic beliefs. Still, others got here to Rowling’s protection, with feminist author Julie Bindel, for instance, noting, “YOU ARE AMAZING.”

Then, simply when the indignant buzz appeared to have died down a bit, Rowling returned to Twitter in June, when she shared an op-ed and apparently took situation with the headline: “Opinion: Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.” With her tweet, she famous, “‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

And there was extra:

The tweets re-sparked rage, damage and allegations of transphobia, together with from a spread of LGBTQ activists, and from organizations together with the Trevor Project and GLAAD.

prolonged piece on her web site, tweeting it with the caption “TERF Wars” and including much more gas to the fireplace.” data-reactid=”83″>Then, shortly thereafter, Rowling revealed a prolonged piece on her web site, tweeting it with the caption “TERF Wars” and including much more gas to the fireplace.

wrote, and then outlined “five reasons for being worried about the new trans activism.” Then came more tweets, in July, calling out the long-term health risks of hormone therapy used to facilitate gender transition. Yet another backlash followed.” data-reactid=”84″>“This isn’t an easy piece to write, for reasons that will shortly become clear, but I know it’s time to explain myself on an issue surrounded by toxicity. I write this without any desire to add to that toxicity,” she wrote, after which outlined “five reasons for being worried about the new trans activism.” Then got here extra tweets, in July, calling out the long-term well being dangers of hormone remedy used to facilitate gender transition. Yet one other backlash adopted.

Now, with this newest bit of stories about Rowling’s new guide, the damage has been stoked, say her detractors.

told Radio Times of the outcry, “I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don’t know why but there’s a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended.” Other defenders include journalist Kim Willsher, Atlantic staff writer Helen Lewis and writers Helen Dale and Andrew Doyle, as well as the U.K. group (which, too, has been called transphobic) LGB Alliance.” data-reactid=”86″>Still, some have come out in her protection — most notably actor Robbie Coltrane, who performed Hagrid within the Harry Potter movies and advised Radio Times of the outcry, “I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don’t know why but there’s a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended.” Other defenders embrace journalist Kim Willsher, Atlantic workers author Helen Lewis and writers Helen Dale and Andrew Doyle, in addition to the U.Ok. group (which, too, has been known as transphobic) LGB Alliance.

who wrote on Tuesday that, while she’s been a longtime fan of all her fiction, “ever since Rowling made headlines this summer for her comments on transgender rights that have been widely condemned as transphobic, I can’t see any story she’s written in the same light … You can’t separate the art from the artist. Not anymore, not when the tone of both author and novel is the same. Rowling maintains she supports trans people, but we can only judge her by her actions and words. After reading 927 pages of them, I’m not inclined to change my judgment.”” data-reactid=”93″>Still, many say their view of Rowling has been ceaselessly tainted, particularly in mild of the most recent guide. That contains USA Today tradition critic Kelly Lawler, who wrote on Tuesday that, whereas she’s been a longtime fan of all her fiction, “ever since Rowling made headlines this summer for her comments on transgender rights that have been widely condemned as transphobic, I can’t see any story she’s written in the same light … You can’t separate the art from the artist. Not anymore, not when the tone of both author and novel is the same. Rowling maintains she supports trans people, but we can only judge her by her actions and words. After reading 927 pages of them, I’m not inclined to change my judgment.”

Related