John Cleese criticized for transphobic tweets: ‘I’m afraid I’m not that fascinated by trans people’

42



John Cleese has sparked outrage on social media once more whereas reinforcing his help of J.Okay. Rowling with contemporary anti-trans commentary.”I’m afraid I’m not that interested in trans folks,” the Monty Python star replied to a query about his help for the Harry Potter writer and her controversial stance on trans individuals. “I just hope they’re happy and that people treat them kindly. Right now I’m more focused on threats to democracy in America, the rampant corruption in the UK, the appalling British Press, the revelations about police brutality…”I’m afraid I’m not that fascinated by trans folksI simply hope they’re completely satisfied and that folks deal with them kindlyRight now I’m extra focussed on threats to democracy in America, the rampant corruption within the UK, the appalling British Press, the revelations about police brutality… https://t.co/y6l33FBQNL— John Cleese (@JohnCleese) November 22, 2020An earlier Tweet requested Cleese, “Why the f– can’t you just let people be who they want to be?” To which he replied, “Deep down, I want to be a Cambodian police woman. Is that allowed, or am I being unrealistic?”Further, the British actor made what he calls a “woke joke” the had followers questioning if it was lastly time to cancel him. While others, reacted by following his lead.”Woke joke,” he wrote. “A production of ‘Macbeth’ may cancelled because the man playing the lead revealed that he had never actually killed anyone Convicted murderers are now being sought Otherwise they will have to stage Chekhov’s Three Sisters, who will be Inuit, Thai and Samoan.”Story continuesI’m personally sick of watching WW2 movies with non-Nazi actors taking part in Nazis. Embarrassingly underrepresented in Hollywood.— Aidan (@LegitCake) November 22, 2020One other commenter questions whether or not his opinion on the subject has to do with him having a “superficial understanding of.””Yes, my understanding is superficial,” he stated. “One thing: When a woman who was once a man is competing against women who have always been women, I think she has an advantage, because she inherited a man’s body, which is usually bigger and stronger than a woman’s Does that prove phobia?”Yes, my understanding is superficialOne factor: When a girl who was as soon as a person is competing towards girls who’ve at all times been girls, I believe she has a bonus, as a result of she inherited a person’s physique, which is often greater and stronger than a girl’sDoes that show phobia? https://t.co/8x2H9zvstd— John Cleese (@JohnCleese) November 22, 2020Associated content material: