Kremlin: Claims of Russian backing for Trump in US election ‘unfaithful’ & right down to ‘paranoia’


Vladimir Putin’s spokesman says statements suggesting Russia plans to intervene on this 12 months’s US Presidential election “don’t have anything in common with the truth.”

Dmitry Peskov slammed the concept that Moscow will try to assist President Donald Trump obtain re-election as being of “paranoid character.”

He was responding to US media studies which claimed US intelligence has warned politicians that Moscow is already laying the groundwork to get behind the Republican Party incumbent. 

CNN, quoting its normal nameless sources, instructed of a briefing the place Russian readiness to make use of hacking, the ‘weaponisation’ of social media, and assaults on election infrastructure was outlined. 

Also on Russiagate returns: MSM & #Resistance ecstatically exploit evidence-free NYT declare Moscow ‘helping Trump in 2020’

The new scare has echoes of the hysteria across the 2016 marketing campaign when Trump unexpectedly beat favourite Hillary Clinton. That led to years of hypothesis, a lot of it typically xenophobic, earlier than particular counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation discovered no proof of collusion between Trump and Russia.

“Unfortunately, there will probably be increasingly [paranoia] as we approach the elections,” Peskov instructed reporters in Moscow on Friday afternoon. 

The New York Times, additionally counting on unnamed ‘insiders,’ kicked of the most recent furore on Thursday night when it reported how “intelligence officials warned House lawmakers last week that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to try to get President Trump re-elected… a disclosure to Congress that angered Mr. Trump, who complained that Democrats would use it against him.”

Also on Here we go once more: Media report ‘Trump asked Assange to deny/cover up link with Russia’… quoting assertion exhibiting no such factor

The newest information of so-called Russian meddling comes shortly after studies that Trump had supplied jailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange a pardon if he would publicly deny that Russia had something to do with e-mail leaks from the DNC which broken Clinton in 2016.

That bombshell information appeared to be a willful misinterpretation of a press release introduced by Assange’s barrister Edward Fitzgerald concerning a go to to Assange by US Congressman Dana Rohrabacher – the place, in accordance with earlier studies, he was supplied “definitive proof that Russia was not the source” of the DNC emails.

Nonetheless, US media has as soon as once more spun into overdrive about alleged Russian interference, regardless of missing any proof or proof, simply in time for the following presidential election cycle.

Like this story? Share it with a buddy!