Lack of actual harassment administration coverage within the EU establishments


The following was filed anonymously some days in the past associated to the administration of harassment and antisemitism circumstances throughout the EU establishments, and specifically the European Union External Action Service (EEAS).

Petition to EP n. 0555/2020:

As described within the notice from the R&D union dated 26.11.2018 addressed to the president of COCOBU *, the crime of harassment and different associated crimes will not be at all times topic to satisfactory prosecution throughout the European establishments, even when these are severe and confirmed, creating de facto impunity and horrifying abuses.

  Despite the efforts – notably of the European Parliament – to counter this observe and the existence of a authorized framework regulating the administration of those conditions and imposing the duty of the establishments to forestall, fight and prosecute the perpetrators of such acts, in addition to ” a proper ban on reprisals towards victims and whistleblowers, the denunciation of those reprehensible acts remains to be the topic of oppression unworthy of the rule of legislation and the elemental values of the European Union.

Having witnessed and been the sufferer of this tradition within the EEAS for a very long time denounced – particularly by girls, being the primary victims – it appears to me crucial that the European Parliament intervenes once more with flying colours to place a definitive finish to a observe reminding hours darkest in European historical past.

Besides the moral and authorized deficit of this case, I wish to ask on your specific consideration, within the mild of the powers of the European Parliament, of the monetary and reputational value of those actions: is the hearth actually definitely worth the candle?

Thus, I want to deliver to the eye of this Petitions Committee the abuses and violence suffered for years throughout the EEAS in reference to my non secular confession and the necessity to defend myself from reprehensible acts dedicated with out respite, and this regardless of the discreet, then more and more vigorous intervention, many inner and exterior interlocutors calling for cause.

Indeed, and whereas I had been assigned “in the interest of the service” (with out having requested it) to the Israel desk of the EEAS, I used to be subjected to systematic, gradual after which violent exclusions from the actions of unity. I used to be capable of be taught later that this exclusion was linked to a rumor extensively unfold throughout the service of my alleged membership within the companies of Mossad.

This exclusion was adopted by one other exclusion, from the Turkish unit this time, the place it was attainable for me to acquire, with nice insistence, the written proof of those innuendo of espionage, with out the least component of there was no proof towards me and no clear indications as to the authors of those prices. In addition, it was additionally attainable for me to testify a number of episodes the place this amalgamation between folks of Jewish religion and brokers of Mossad was made, my case being sadly not distinctive.

Following the denunciation of this discriminatory remedy, I used to be the topic of abuse, mistreatment and violence of all types, specifically by the chief of sources, supported by a community of accomplices by motion and / or omission, geared toward clearly the destruction of my skilled, ethical and monetary integrity.

This indicative and positively overwhelming checklist, can’t sufficiently describe the extent and the gravity of the relentlessness which I used to be subjected to.

This is how, for at the very least Four years, I’ve been the topic of assorted abusive “security” investigations first, carried out with out my information for alleged acts of espionage on behalf of Israel, Turkey and Russia , whereas assigning me anti-terrorism capabilities, then accusations of all types various as and when they’re denied throughout the administrative, pre-disciplinary and disciplinary investigations carried out by IDOC within the request of the director of sources and on his behalf towards cost, starting from the alleged sharing of confidential paperwork with third states to insubordination, inadequate efficiency, non-cooperation, to an alleged historical past of inauspicious relationships or paranoid behaviors.

These investigations, carried out in a grossly unlawful method, with libelous results on my numerous employers and colleagues, constituting threats and fixed makes an attempt at dismissal primarily based on false statements, are characterised specifically by: gross violation of the precept of adversarial legislation, ignoring my systematic objections and contributions in addition to my numerous requests for entry to paperwork and knowledge, excluding any favorable testimony in violation of the suitable to a good trial and my rights of protection, the suitable of entry to my private knowledge, briefly , in clear violation of the complete nationwide regulatory framework,

European and worldwide relevant within the matter.

To this virulent oppression was added an undue discount in wage of greater than 18,000 euros on the idea of false declarations of absence and forgery in writing on the a part of my Head of Division – together with even absences for future dates – in live performance with the human sources division, the rejection of mission requests, requests for telework, coaching, refusal of job modifications {and professional} alternatives exterior the European establishments, cuts to entry to my electronic mail account, eradicating my telephone from my workplace and even assaulting my automotive.

In the occasion that any doubt stays as to the intentionality of those acts, Mr. ST, former head of Division – having been promoted to the publish of director shortly after the submitting in my opinion of a prison grievance towards him, confessed with enjoyable and delight that he was a part of such a plot. On the opposite hand, Mr. GdV shamelessly expressed in his notice of October 4, 2019 – in a paternalistic and condescending tone – that his determination to dismiss me from my publish was notably motivated by the absence of “repentance” on my half as a result of truth the denunciation of those vile acts. A employees member from the human sources unit would have kindly guided me by indicating that I had been the sufferer of a “bunch of people who wanted to tease you”.

Given the gravity of this case and believing that the denial of justice in addition to the prosecution of the victims denouncing these reprehensible acts – equivalent to harassment and attainable hate crimes – represent acts of an anti-Semitic nature, and that they subsequently don’t have any place throughout the European establishments, in accordance with the declarations of the European Council of December 6, 2018 and the decision of the European Parliament of June 1, 2017, referring to the Union’s willpower to fight anti-Semitism in all its varieties, I ask you to help me in order that the EEAS and people accountable such acts are referred to as to reply to your establishment in the identical manner because the EESC and its leaders.

It ought to be famous that I need to attraction to your Commission, having sadly famous the failure of the mechanisms offered to forestall these abuses within the administration of public sources.

I’m very grateful to the late Mr G. Buttarelli, former EDPS, for having despatched me the paperwork in his possession which allowed me to find a part of this grim technique, regardless of the efforts of the EEAS sources director to forestall him from doing so. However, I can solely deplore the refusal of the European Ombudsman to intervene on this case by denying my proper of entry to the related paperwork in her determination of 23/03/2018 made in reference to the grievance reference 1133/2017 / LM “to avoid being drawn into a long-lasting dispute”; isn’t this the position of a mediator?

It is in these circumstances that I request the help of this Petitions Committee in an effort to additionally acquire:

– the cessation of the persecution of which I’m nonetheless the topic, the EEAS persevering with to behave throughout the COVID-19 disaster, and specifically, the rapid suspension of the disciplinary proceedings opened and carried out solely towards me and geared toward my dismissal, in addition to any additional makes an attempt to hurt me,

– the transmission of the complete file to a physique impartial from the EEAS (Parliamentary Commission or OLAF) and even from European establishments (equivalent to UNIA or nationwide courts), in an effort to enable the conduct of an neutral and goal investigation permitting lastly the institution of the reality and a follow-up as of proper.

This must also pressure this service to lastly produce the paperwork requested many occasions over time, in addition to to listen to witnesses dismissed by the IDOC companies and by the EEAS disciplinary council (composed solely of males subordinate to the director normal sources), permitting the neutral institution of the details, the suitable prosecution of the perpetrators and compensation for the immense injury suffered on account of the entire scenario.

– on this regard, I ask on your assist in order that my requests for the waiver of the immunity of Mssieurs G.d.V. and S.T. in an effort to enable the prison proceedings to proceed.

– lastly, it appears to me important to ask the EEAS to provide an account of the price of this case, – and specifically of the companies subcontracted by the EEAS equivalent to the assorted inquiries – extended in a superfluous manner, by reminding the potential of asking the assorted authors answerable for responding of those acts prejudicial to Community pursuits.

I warmly thank the honorable members of this Petitions Committee on your help and consideration, and stay at your total disposal for any info in assist of my allegations.