Pakistan rejected Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim that Islamabad had requested a ceasefire. The Foreign Office spokesman added that at a time when international efforts are being made for regional peace and stability, the statement is representing a dangerous trend based on false information, political, opportunism and a clear violation of international law.
Trump, on the other hand, said during a ceremony in Saudi Arabia that we may also gather them a little, where he should go out and eat good food together, and solve problems. War is not a solution to a problem but a problem itself.
After the ceasefire, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi took a strong tone against Pakistan in his address to the nation. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry termed the Indian Prime Minister’s statement provocative, while on the other hand a new diplomatic war has begun in India and Pakistan.
The two countries have ordered each other’s diplomats to leave the country by accusing them of being involved in “unwanted activities”. The move comes after a recent military conflict and a ceasefire between the two countries under pressure from the United States, which has led to a new diplomatic crash between the two rivals.
A French newspaper has strongly criticized Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying that Modi put oil on the burning, while his face looked terrifying while speaking. History has once again proved that if the dreamed leader of power ignores ground facts, they have to face down and big dreams sometimes become the forerunner of major tragedies. One of the major flaws of Modi’s policies was that he started deciding in the world of dreams rather than ground realities.
The desire to make India a global power in its place, but that desire can only be fulfilled when the state’s policies have the ability to balance, dedicate and understand regional facts. In Modi’s power, India adopted an aggressive policy with neighboring countries, which resulted in diplomatic isolation and military failure. Inside the country, the situation was no different. The elimination of Kashmir’s special status, anti -Muslim laws and action against minorities have made the Modi government controversial globally. The US, Europe and the United Nations expressed concern over human rights abuses, but the Indian government rejected every criticism as propaganda.
‘Operation Sandor’ was another military project that pushed the Modi government into trouble. When the Modi government confronted Pakistan after promoting its ‘military’ statement after the Pahalgam incident, it resulted in something else. Operation Sandur was an operation aimed at demonstrating India’s strength during tensions with Pakistan, especially with the help of modern Air Force’s modern Rafael aircraft. Modi described Rafael aircraft as an important pillar of military power and claimed to have paralyzed Pakistan’s defense system through these aircraft.
Modi believed that Rafael aircraft would prove to be a game changer for India and that the presence of these aircraft would defeat Pakistan, but when Indian aircraft were used to take action against Pakistan’s air defense in Operation Sindh, Pakistan not only neutralized them but also destroyed the aircraft. India, which claims the world’s largest democracy, is now using nationalism as a weapon to divert attention from internal problems and global criticism. This dangerous political strategy has become a serious threat to the region’s peace.
For the first time, a large section of the Indian people is raising questions internally instead of blaming Pakistan every time. The questions are being raised, where were India’s Kashmir where such a wide security forces were? What were the seven million troops stationed in Kashmir? This is an important moment of thinking and a great support of Pakistan’s position. Pakistan has repeatedly accuses India of secret support of Baloch separatists, involvement in terrorism and backing destructive operations through Indian consulates in Afghanistan, which clear evidence points to Indian intelligence agencies.
Today, the Modi government has brought the infrastructure of Indian democracy to the brink of destruction, but today Modi’s media, institutions and education in India have all suffered from this narrow ideology. Religious minorities have increased and freedom of expression is being severely crushed. Today, journalists, intellectuals and social workers who were once seen with respect have either been silenced or under pressure. Modi, the main character of the 2002 Gujarat riots, is now pursuing the policies that are leading India to dictatorship. His government has not only jeopardized the democratic foundations of India but also created instability throughout South Asia. Their legacy of violence causes violence and eliminates reconciliation and can no longer be hidden.
Pakistan, which has nuclear power and the world’s best forces, is being forced to think that it should fight a powerful enemy or to work wisely by acting in the Indian people and world powers that they will control this situation. Pakistan is not as lonely as an island, but it is important to be the most important of it. If only the economy is talked about, it is clear that the prosperous future of Greater Asia and the Middle East is related to the peace of South Asia.
Indian authorities have been stubborn even after the recent Pak -India tensions, while on the one hand, the conflict on Kashmir has been declared rigid, demonstrating its stubbornness, saying that the Sindh Tas Treaty will remain suspended. A full and immediate ceasefire was announced between India and Pakistan on May 10 after a several -day military clash, which brought neighbors equipped with both nuclear weapons to the brink of war.
On the other hand, the US president reiterated in the US, Saudi investment forum that “the United States played a vital role in decreasing tensions and ceasefire between India and Pakistan” while the Indian government is rejecting the claim. The US President says that both nuclear powers, India and Pakistan have offered trade concessions, if you (India and Pakistan) stop the fighting, we will trade with you, if you do not stop the fight, there will be no trade.
Trump’s statement has given rise to a new debate whether the US president’s “mediation policy” is helpful for peace in the region. India’s saying that Pakistan went to the US president for mediation, has proved false, US journalist Nick Robertson has also said that Pakistan has not contacted India. In this context, Pakistan has welcomed the offer of US arbitration, saying it is ready to join it. The Foreign Minister of Pakistan said that if India is ready for talks, then Pakistan is ready to join it. He said that dialogue between the two countries is necessary to resolve the Kashmir issue and it should not be avoided with the help of any third party.
In all this situation, the responsibility of the international community for the peace and stability of South Asia has increased. The international community should take effective steps to reduce tensions between India and Pakistan and try to bring the two countries to the negotiating table. It is time for the global community to use its influence to play a role in establishing peace in South Asia.
(Tagstotranslate) khittay ke aman ka dushman modi
Source link
