Nancy Mace humiliated on MSNBC after being referred to as out for parroting incorrect impeachment declare


Republican Nancy Mace speaks to the crowd at an event with Sen. Lindsey Graham. (Getty Images)

Republican Nancy Mace speaks to the gang at an occasion with Sen. Lindsey Graham. (Getty Images)

Republican lawmakers proceed to cling to the flimsy argument that Donald Trump‘s second impeachment just isn’t constitutional, and, as exemplified by a current MSNBC look by Congresswoman Nancy Mace, defending it has develop into an train in cognitive dissonance.

Ms Mace was interviewed on MSNBC as a part of the station’s impeachment protection and argued that “impeaching a president who is no longer a president has never been done before”.

MSNBC host Craig Melvin reminded Ms Mace that Mr Trump was impeached whereas he was nonetheless president.

She apparently misunderstood the host’s level.

“Right, this is a second impeachment trial,” Ms Mace mentioned. “We’ve never impeached a president who is no longer president, that’s never been done in our nation’s history, to my knowledge.”

Republican lawmakers, particularly these within the Senate, have insisted that the impeachment trial just isn’t constitutional as a result of Mr Trump is not serving as president.

Democrats, constitutional students and 5 Republican senators disagreed with the interpretation.

Republican senators are poised to make use of the structure argument as a solution to keep away from upsetting Mr Trump’s base by voting to convict him whereas nonetheless avoiding a direct endorsement of the previous president’s actions.

Later within the interview, Ms Mace repeated the false declare that Mr Trump was impeached after he was out of workplace. She was then challenged and corrected.

“The impeachment process as I’ve stated before is unconstitutional, impeaching a president who is no longer a president has never been done before in this country,” she mentioned.

MSNBC host Chuck Todd then interrupted her to problem her assertion.

“You keep saying that congresswoman, that is not the case. He was president of the United States when he was impeached. He is an impeached president even if he is convicted,” he mentioned.

He then defined that the Senate had already dominated the case was constitutional, as is its proper below US regulation.

“He was president when he was impeached. The constitutionality question has also been answered by the US Senate, because our constitution says the following; the US Senate handles all impeachment trials. And it is up to them and they’ve said that this is constitutional,” he mentioned. “So, I know that it is your opinion that it is not, but now that it is deemed constitutional, and he has been impeached, what do you do?”

Ms Mace dodged answering the query straight, and as a substitute prompt Mr Trump be tried as a non-public citizen in a felony court docket.

“Well if prosecutors do believe he incited an attack on the Capitol, then there’s a criminal court where they can file charges in this instance, would be another option,” she mentioned.

Read More

‘Knock the crap out of them’: Videos of Trump encouraging violence through the years performed at impeachment trial

Videos used as proof in Trump impeachment trial gathered from Parler by nameless ‘hacktivist’

Biden says ‘minds may have been changed’ by graphic movies at Trump impeachment trial

Trump ‘eerily silent’ in wake of assault and confirmed ‘no remorse’, impeachment trial hears

Some Republicans are receptive to Democrats’ impeachment arguments — however that may all change on Friday

The case in opposition to Trump: The proof getting used through the impeachment trial

Yahoo News