It has been two and a half years since the government of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. One and a half years have passed since the incident of May 9 and the founder of PTI has been in jail for more than one year. General Faiz Hameed’s imprisonment has also passed. Half a year has passed.
In view of all these circumstances and especially after the November 26 incident, the important development is that the PTI founder has finally agreed to negotiate, the emotionality in his words has subsided. Now it is seen that PTI is not one but two, one inside the country and one outside the country. As Muttahida used to be two. One inside the country and one outside the country. Those who were outside the united country used to talk about rebellion and those who were inside the united country were afraid of such things.
Then the two factions got separated and then it happened that the existence of both gradually ended. Why does this happen? Or is it done? What is common and what is not common between the founder of PTI and the founder of Muttahida? Putting this question aside, the importance is that the policy was the same during the time of Muttahida, that was Afghan. The policy and the narrative created by General Zia-ul-Haq. That is the policy of Taliban friendship and extremism. That is why the founder Muttahida raised the flags of rebellion, their content is different. Now there has been a change in the policy and narrative of the state. Behind the founding of Muttahida were almost the same forces that wanted to see Pakistan weak and now these same elements are behind the founding of PTI.
Historically, the state of Pakistan was dominated by the powers that considered the country as a front-line state against the Soviet Union in the background of the Cold War. America used to give dollars to these elements and in return they as the ruling class supported their policies and policies. There were facilitators in the conspiracies that they should be supported only in weakening the democracy here. In the conflict of the cold war, when the dictatorship was ruling here, they would sincerely promote the ambitions of the superpowers because if If they did not do this, these superpowers would have exposed a democratic movement. Here democracy was also on the tail of Baisakhis, so in a sense it was also indebted to external masters.
Thirty-five years ago, the Soviet Union collapsed. The C-130 crashed. When the Soviet Union left Afghanistan, the way was paved for democracy here too. But Zia-ul-Haq Sahib left the sword of 58(2)(b) hanging through the amendments in the constitution and with the same sword, Ghulam Ishaq Khan made the fortress of democracy here. Suppressed.
By ending these democratic governments with the same sword, four governments were overthrown in eight years. Before these democratic governments, there was only one democratic government which completed the democratic period of five years. That was the reign of Bhutto who completed his term and gave this country a complete constitution. This democratic government completed its term probably because we lost half of the country.
Bhutto may have become too confident considering his public popularity, in such a situation General Zia-ul-Haq was brought close to him. He was recommended by King Hussein of Jordan and King of Iran and both of them are said to be very close to America. They did not like it because these two measures were highly offensive to the foreign masters. At that time, the thinking that we see today in the form of Zalmay Khalilzad was settled in the powerful institutions of America.
Now the US is also seen to be weak and there is an echo of a new block in the world. Thanks to the aggressive style of Russia, a war situation has arisen in the Middle East and that is why we have seen a delay in the formation of this new block. This time. The president of the United States is going to be a person who is said to be the cause of the loss of the United States. Trump becoming the president may cause financial and economic problems for China because China’s exports to the United States. But under the Trump administration, more taxes and duties will be implemented has been
Pakistan’s closeness to China is a reflection of the deterioration in Pakistan’s politics. Foreign powers have always interfered in the internal and political problems of this country, and we have not been able to get out of this trap whenever we wanted. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto repeatedly called Pakistan. wanted to get rid of these factors but could not and when we saw that America had strengthened its ties with India, we took steps towards China, we also got the answer internally.
In all these matters, India took the lead because India did not think that an economically strong Pakistan could morally sustain its nuclear program in the manner and a secular road map that Jinnah gave in his August 11 speech. Tha, will maintain its claim on Kashmir by firmly stepping on this road map. However, our claim on Kashmir came up as a barrier between our democratic distances. Religious extremism took this aim, India did a good propaganda against it, gave it wrong color. We made our friends in Afghanistan but He remains our biggest enemy. Khan Sahib is different from the leader of MQM because the policy shift has come within the thinking of the state, the state is also facing conflict from within. External forces are also involved in this. are
The dialogue between the government and the PTI is not going well with the PTI sitting outside. The local PTI wants to extend the dialogue because after the November 26 incident, they have realized that the state is still so weak. It has not weakened. Whatever damage has been done by these actions has been done to democracy and not to the state, the civilian supremacy has been weakened, not the state.
By the end of this year, the economic status of Pakistan has certainly stabilized, but politically there are still many questions that have not been answered. is a group of These people are extremely rich but do not pay taxes. They consider power as their capitalism. There is a need to get rid of this aristocracy, but its signs are not visible for a long time.
Pakistan has to emerge as a modern state, which is currently the home of terrorists in the world’s imagination. Here is the camp of extremists. To end this concept of the world, very concrete and comprehensive measures have to be taken. This was the serious crisis of the 19th century, where the external powers created a force internally to end the state, which made the country Economic status weakened. Created such a situation that somehow the nuclear program of this country could be stopped and aid would be given instead.
