OPCW seems to collude with Western nations to pin Navalny’s ‘poisoning’ on Russia, Moscow’s envoy to the watchdog claims to RT

The chemical weapons watchdog OPCW has been stonewalling Russia’s makes an attempt to resolve the alleged poisoning of Russian opposition determine Alexey Navalny, main Moscow to query the group’s motives.

That’s in response to Alexander Shulgin, Russia’s envoy to the group, who stated that the Technical Secretariat of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has “derailed” actions that Moscow requested from it within the Navalny ‘poisoning’ case.

Officials supplied a joint Russian-OPCW probe over the chemical allegedly used to poison the Russian activist. It would assist to higher perceive the precise circumstances and timeline of the invention of the poisonous chemical in Navalny’s physique after he was flown to Germany, Moscow claimed.

The supply was denied “under the pretext there was no precedent for such assistance,” Shulgin instructed RT. “This was really sad and leads us to believe that the concerted action [against Russia] involves not only certain countries but also the Technical Secretariat.”

Also on rt.com US & allies don’t care about Navalny, wish to use alleged poisoning to stigmatize Russia, Moscow’s envoy to OPCW tells RT

Navalny fell critically unwell in August 2020 and was flown to Germany for remedy after his situation was stabilized in Russia. The German authorities and its allies later accused the Russian safety providers of utilizing a potent military-grade poison in an try and homicide the opposition activist.

Moscow denied the allegations and stated the case seemed to be a body job by intelligence providers hostile to Russia. It stated Western nations accusing Russia are clearly pushing their narratives surrounding the case in a coordinated method. They even produced their responses to the most recent Russian queries to them on the identical day, Shulgin stated.

The OPCW was referred to as in to research blood samples taken from Navalny and has confirmed the German evaluation of the poison, although its actual system was by no means revealed to the general public. Russia’s request to reveal it in non-public was denied by Germany, which, Shulgin identified, made no sense since Berlin insists that Russia already possesses it and used it towards Navalny.

Moscow has questioned many components of the Western investigation and says neither the federal government accusing it nor the OPCW offered cheap solutions. For instance, Shulgin stated, the OPCW has very strict rules on how materials proof must be dealt with throughout investigations to guard the chain of custody. “At every step of the way the handling of evidence is documented and videotaped,” he defined.

Russia requested the Technical Secretariat to supply related information within the Navalny case, significantly of the second his blood was drawn on the Charite hospital in Berlin and the second the samples had been divided on the Hague earlier than being despatched to OPCW-certified labs for evaluation.

“For months the Technical Secretariat remained silent. Now they have attempted to respond and what we received was incoherent. They are hiding something,” he stated. “Note that a lack of the evidence that the chain of custody was fully protected is very significant. All the conclusions made based on that evidence may be deemed null and void.”

The OPCW is anticipated to be a impartial physique that, amongst different issues, supplies member states with correct investigations and scientific evaluation of alleged circumstances of chemical weapon use. Critics say it has deviated from its core mission lately, led astray by political concerns.

Also on rt.com Western diplomats want to return to science class in the event that they imagine in Syrian chemical weapons claims, Russian UN envoy says

The most obvious instance was its investigation of the 2018 incident in Douma, Syria, which the OPCW all however blamed on the Syrian authorities. It was later revealed that the group’s management sidelined its personal investigators, whose evaluation of the proof on the bottom contradicted that narrative.

The OPCW accusations of Damascus of dropping chlorine canisters on Douma offered justification after the actual fact for the retaliatory strikes that the US, UK, and France launched towards Syria weeks after the incident.

When dissenting inspectors blew the whistle on the state of affairs, the OPCW labeled them as disgruntled former staff who didn’t have entry to extra proof, and refused to handle considerations about potential bias in its ultimate report.

If you want this story, share it with a good friend!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading. We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads! We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising. Please add www.postofasia.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.