Asylum seekers who efficiently made it throughout the Belarusian border and into Poland should not be expelled and can’t legally be returned, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has dominated, following a criticism by 198 migrants.
The ruling follows final month’s large progress within the variety of refugees on the Belarus-Poland border. The migrant disaster started earlier this 12 months, with individuals, primarily from the Middle East, flocking to Minsk in an try to cross over into the EU. The scenario escalated on November 6, when a number of thousand asylum seekers marched collectively to the border. Some of them tried to enter Polish territory by breaking down the barbed wire fence.
In November, some migrants efficiently made it throughout the frontier. However, regardless of Poland desirous to ship them again, Warsaw has been advised that it’s unlawful. A bunch of refugees appealed to the ECHR, which dominated of their favor.
“In most cases, the applicants claim to be on Polish territory allegedly with a view to seeking international protection… They allege that their lives will be in danger if they are sent back to Belarus and, in some cases, subsequently to their countries of origin,” the ECHR ruling states, explaining that it obtained 47 purposes from 198 migrants. The Court agreed with 43 out of the 47.
“In the majority of applications… [the Court] ruled that the applicants should not be removed from Poland if they were indeed on Polish territory.”
The migrant disaster started in June when Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko stated his authorities would not assist the EU cease unlawful immigration. He stands accused by Brussels of “weaponizing” migrants by flying them into his nation and transporting them to the border, allegedly as a part of a “hybrid war” towards the West. Minsk has denied the accusations.