Rewriting historical past


A French museum halted an exhibition about Mongol chief Genghis Khan as a result of after coming beneath excessive strain from the Chinese Communist Party to take away any reference to the famed medieval Mongol warrior; a part of Beijing’s energetic marketing campaign to manage the nation’s cultural narrative and a key element in Xi Jinping’s marketing campaign to rewrite China’s historical past and match it intently to the Communist Party’s more and more Maoist worldview.
The incident occurred at a historical past museum within the western French metropolis of Nantes on October 12, when Chinese authorities demanded that sure phrases, together with “Genghis Khan,” “Empire” and “Mongol”, be faraway from the exhibition. They later demanded that Chinese officers take over creative management of the exhibition and overview the texts, maps, and brochures that might be made obtainable to the general public, France 24 reported.
The hardening, this summer season, of the Chinese authorities’s place in the direction of the Mongol minority prompted the halt of the exhibition, the museum was quoted as saying. China’s censorship try is linked to Beijing’s coercive actions that stay ongoing in Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia.
Justin Urquhart Stewart, the co-founder of Regionally, Britain’s main regional funding platform, instructed New Europe by cellphone on October 15 that China is making an attempt to rewrite any interval of its historical past that doesn’t match the strict narrative of the Communist Party.
“They rewrite history, so they have their version of it. They will not say they are rewriting it. They will sort of say their history needs to be corrected because we, the West, are the people that wrote it. So, in their view, Tibet was always Chinese. It was actually 10 years ago that the Mongols were faced with the question, ‘If you are not Chinese you must be Russian.’ And, obviously, the Mongols were put in a rather difficult position because they did not want to be either. You are, I’m afraid, going to see more of this,” Urquhart Stewart mentioned.
China has constructed what it calls “re-education” camps the place the nation’s ethnic minorities, these which aren’t Han Chinese, are taken to rob them of their linguistic, cultural and non secular identification so as conform with the Communist Party’s coverage of a single China with a single identification.
Urquhart Stewart mentioned China is now flexing its muscle mass on its borders with northeast India, the East China Sea with Japan, and the South China Sea and the nations within the area.
“It is a theme that’s going to carry on and it’s going to be significantly difficult to manage. That’s why the Chinese are desperately hoping for a (US Presidential candidate Joe) Biden victory in the election because they think Biden would be more open to change and adjustments and, therefore, as far as they are concerned, will actually turn the wick up at the moment to then allow them to negotiate back afterwards,” Urquhart Stewart argued. “But be wary of the Chinese as far as they are concerned. They are a huge trading and financial power and they will be using their clout. This time it won’t just be for trade, it will be influencing cultural issues as well,” he warned.
A view of the 30-meter-high statue of the founding father of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan, accomplished in 2008, positioned 54 km east of capital Ulan Bator, Mongolia. EPA-EFE//MICHAEL KOHNAs COVID-19 has proven, Chinese propaganda is a nicely organised and orchestrated effort. Over the previous decade, the Communist Party has invested billions of {dollars} into abroad disinformation operations and the unfold of pro-Chinese information.
Urquhart Stewart mentioned the Communist Party is making an attempt to manage each the battlefield and the cultural area, as a result of “the same cultural myths will be told in other areas of the world about Western neo-colonialism caused by the British and other European powers. You can already see this occurring on small Caribbean islands where the Chinese are going there and saying, ‘This is an investment, not colonialism. The problem is that it is colonialism by another name and it is effectively rewriting the history there.”
“I find it very insidious that what you are seeing is economic involvement with low-cost loans to buy into infrastructure that often cannot be paid back. This means that the property assets then go into indirect Chinese government hands, just as we have seen in Shri Lanka and parts of Africa,” he mentioned, including, “You then see influence being impacted in terms of trade, as you see with Australia in terms of the attitude when it comes to politics. You even now have some Australian journalists who are under house arrest in Beijing. The extension from that into cultural strength and angling, which is something that they see as an extension of their power”.