Some act or omission needs to be attributed to individual in street accident to show contributory negligence: SC

Some act or omission needs to be attributed to an individual in a street accident towards whom contributory negligence is alleged, the Supreme Court has stated. A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and V Ramasubramanian made the commentary on an enchantment filed by a lady and her minor kids towards the findings of the Karnataka High Court that her deceased husband, who was driving the automobile which dashed right into a lorry, was additionally responsible of contributory negligence.

The excessive court docket had stated the girl and her minor kids are entitled solely to 50 per cent of the quantity of compensation as decided.

The apex court docket held nevertheless that the mere failure to keep away from the collision by taking some extraordinary precaution doesn’t in itself represent negligence.

“To establish contributory negligence, some act or omission, which materially contributed to the accident or the damage, should be attributed to the person against whom it is alleged,” the bench stated whereas reversing the excessive court docket’s discovering.

The prime court docket stated that the view expressed by the excessive court docket to the impact that if the driving force of the automobile had been vigilant and driving the car rigorously following the visitors rules, the accident wouldn’t have occurred, is presumptuous and never based mostly on any proof.

“There was nothing on record to indicate that the driver of the car was not driving at moderate speed nor that he did not follow traffic rules. On the contrary, the High Court holds that if the lorry had not been parked on the highway, the accident would not have happened even if the car was driven at a high speed,” the bench stated in its October 6 order.

Allowing the enchantment, the apex court docket modified the excessive court docket judgment and directed {that a} complete compensation of Rs 50,89,96 be paid with curiosity at 9 per cent every year.

On February 10, 2011, the automobile wherein the deceased was travelling, dashed towards a lorry within the entrance when its driver allegedly stopped it abruptly with none sign or indicator.

The sufferer suffered severe accidents and died on the spot.

Claiming that the accident occurred because of the rash and negligent driving on the a part of the driving force of the lorry, the petitioners filed a declare earlier than the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal looking for compensation in a sum of Rs 54,10,000.

According to the appellants, the sufferer was 32 years of age on the time of the accident and that he was employed as a Senior Design Engineer in an organization incomes a sum of Rs 45,000 monthly with vibrant future prospects.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading. We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads! We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising. Please add www.postofasia.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.