Syrian regime forces Homs residents to reopen their retailers

22
GettyImages 665697580 870

Feb 2, 2021

ALEPPO, Syria — The government-affiliated Homs Governorate Council lately gave the house owners of the retailers situated in Homs metropolis middle a two-month deadline to reopen their retailers that had been destroyed throughout the warfare.

On Jan. 24, Al-Watan day by day, a newspaper near the Syrian regime, quoted a supply on the Homs Chamber of Commerce as saying, “The [Homs] council held successive meetings in the past period with merchants and neighborhood committees during which it called on them to return to the shopping district following its rehabilitation. In case they fail to do so, the council threatened to open the shops themselves. During the last meeting, they were given a two-month deadline to arrange their affairs and reopen their shops.”

The supply added, “The shopping district in Homs city center is ready to resume activity as more than 70% of the rehabilitation works have been completed since the reconstruction campaign was launched four years ago in cooperation with the United Nations Development Program, the Homs Chamber of Commerce, the government service institutions and the local community.”

Ghazwan al-Nakdali, an activist and member of the Syrian Association for Citizens’ Dignity (SACD), informed Al-Monitor, “The threats leveled by the Homs council against the shopkeepers reflect the regime’s desire to speed up the commercial district’s recovery.”

He famous that the Homs Chamber of Commerce started selling the choice, which primarily targets the retailers situated within the coated market and vegetable market. Ostensibly, the choice serves the regime’s propaganda that it has accomplished the restoration works of the markets within the outdated neighborhoods of Homs and introduced them again to life after having destroyed them in its combating in opposition to the Free Syrian Army (FSA) within the early years of the Syrian revolution, he added.

The council ’s choice and threats increase many questions on the destiny of closed retailers and shops that anti-regime house owners deserted years in the past when the residents have been displaced in early July 2014. The markets the provincial council approached are situated within the neighborhoods that the FSA had held in 2012-13 and the place fierce battles raged between the warring sides. They have been bombed with numerous forms of weapons and besieged by the regime forces that displaced their residents of those massively destroyed neighborhoods

Aisha Sapri, a journalist for Aram Media Network, informed Al-Monitor, “The Homs Governorate Council is pressuring shopkeepers to open their shops in the Naoura, Abu Aouf and Bab Houd markets, the covered market and other shops in the city center that were severely damaged during the fighting between the FSA and regime forces in 2012 and 2013. The decision requires the owners to open their stores by a certain date or else their stores would be seized.”

She mentioned, “The decision would make it easy for the regime to seize the shops whose owners are against the regime and are displaced. A large number of the residents of Homs’ old neighborhoods have been displaced. The regime officials want to steal the displaced’s properties in a way that would seem legal. Those who do not want their properties to be confiscated will need to either bribe the council’s officials or risk their lives and that of their family by returning to Homs — which the regime forces and its security branches control — so as to open their shops out of fear of losing them.”

Sapri added, “The council’s decision consists of pressure placed by the Assad regime on the shopkeepers and aims to limit their options. The vast majority [of shopkeepers] were forcibly displaced and are afraid to return to the regime areas. They might consider selling their stores out of fear that the regime seizes them, and subsequently they would accept to sell them at a very low price to the warlords in Homs. These are mostly close to the Iranian forces and militias’ commanders, whose members are mostly Alawite and Shiite. The regime continues to work on a demographic change in Homs. It did not content itself with displacing Sunni Syrians from Homs. It also wants to take their real estate, properties and everything that ties them to their city away from them.”

Samer Homsi, a political activist and member of the opposition’s General Political Commission for Homs governorate, informed Al-Monitor, “Russia is the one backing such decisions because it seeks the return of refugees and displaced to Homs, as it does in all of the regime-restored areas. This step supports the Russian allegations of facilitating the return of the displaced and guaranteeing their safety and that the regime will not arrest them in case they decide to return. The majority of the displaced do not buy these allegations and do not trust the Assad regime or its allies.”

Mahmoud Jadaan, a media activist displaced from Homs and a member of the Syrian Revolutionaries’ Gathering, informed Al-Monitor, “The markets that the regime claims having rehabilitated and wants to open are located in the old neighborhoods of Homs and in the vicinity of Khalidiya, Jouret al-Shiyah, Qusour, Qarabis and Baba Amr neighborhoods that are almost totally destroyed. Most of the residents have fled and those who stayed lack basic services such as water, electricity and health services. It is impossible to bring the markets and destroyed neighborhoods back to life at present. Also, who would guarantee safety for those displaced who decide to return and open their stores? I know a lot of people who were arrested by the regime when they returned to Homs in the past years.”

Rami Kasam, a lawyer and member of SACD, informed Al-Monitor, “The council’s decision serves the regime’s propaganda that life has returned to the devastated areas, the economy is steadily advancing and that the shopkeepers in Homs are back and that all displaced residents willing to return are allowed in. Such allegations are deceptive. Through this decision, the regime seeks to steal the properties of the anti-regime displaced that it targets.”

Source