Defense Minister Benny Gantz’s physique language stated all of it. His emotions had been evident throughout Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s speech to mark the opening of the Knesset’s winter session final Monday [Oct. 4].
During his speech, Bennett revealed that the Mossad had been working in overseas international locations to accumulate info about navigator Ron Arad, who was captured and disappeared in Lebanon 35 years in the past. Even together with his masks on, the protection minister appeared resentful and jumpy. He was sitting beside Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and Justice Minister Gideon Saar, each of who appeared relaxed and pleasant, every time they interacted. Anyone may see that of the individuals sitting there, Gantz was the outsider.
In this case, nonetheless, the protection minister’s glares represented way more than the on a regular basis rigidity between the 2 males. It mirrored one thing that had occurred simply moments earlier than Bennett took the rostrum. That was the primary time Bennett knowledgeable the protection minister that he deliberate to go public in regards to the operation, which Gantz had initially permitted. In distinction, Bennett knowledgeable Lapid of his intentions properly earlier than his speech to the Knesset.
Gantz thought of the move a mistake, however there was nothing he may do at that second to cease Bennett. It was apparent to him that Bennett’s issues had been political, an try to enhance his dismal rankings within the polls. What made issues worse was that the “bold” operation, as Bennett described it, had no concrete outcomes, nor did it provide any clues to the thriller surrounding Ron Arad’s destiny.
Bennett, it appears, realized that Gantz would possible attempt to cease him from disclosing the story of the operation to the general public. That was apparently why Bennett determined to exclude Gantz.
As quickly as Bennett completed his speech, the media began asking robust questions on why it was even vital to debate an operation that didn’t have any constructive outcomes. Criticism from high safety officers solely intensified the subsequent day, when the overseas press revealed that the Mossad kidnapped an Iranian normal in Syria as a part of its efforts to seek out details about Arad. According to stories showing abroad, the overall was taken to some nation in Africa, the place he was interrogated and launched.
Immediately after this, a supply within the protection institution was quoted as saying that the operation had failed. As reported in Haaretz, the supply stated that the operation, “didn’t yield the desired results and the information we were hoping for wasn’t uncovered.” Channel 12 News reported that Mossad Chief David Barnea known as the operation a “failure.” Apparently, he instructed his people who the operation “was bold, daring and complex. But it wasn’t a success, it failed. It was a failure.”
An unnamed supply within the Prime Minister’s Office pushed again in opposition to this criticism, saying that this was “a profitable operation that didn’t result in a major breakthrough.” The source said that Bennett’s decision to go public was coordinated fully with the Mossad: “The head of the Mossad issued a message to the members of the organization in which he said that the operation was successful and important.”
Regardless of whether it was important or not, Bennett did not gain from it. It also opened a window into the growing tension between him and Gantz. People close to the prime minister are convinced that the defense minister himself is behind all the statements attributed to “defense officials” intended to make Bennett look bad.
Given this, it is no longer possible to hide the tense, often murky relationship between Gantz and Bennett. The real question is how it will impact an already fragile coalition.
Gantz may be a major pillar of this coalition, but he is still considered “problematic.” Ever since the new government was formed, he has made no effort to hide his frustration. He knows that he would be prime minister now, if only he had accepted Netanyahu’s offers. Actually, Gantz and his Blue and White party still receive offers from the Likud to dismantle the current government. If Gantz does this, sources say, he would immediately become prime minister. While Gantz rejects these offers, he has enjoyed flaunting them ever since the coalition was formed to maintain a “balance of terror” with the other coalition partners.
While Gantz does not seem ready to blow up the coalition, the fact that he lets that option hover over the government creates an overall sense of apprehension. But this is a serious problem. A prime minister should not feel so wary of his defense minister that he decides to keep important information from him. It could result in a major crisis.
In August it was revealed that Bennett’s diplomatic adviser Shimrit Meir met with the Chief of the Southern Command Major General Eliezer Toledano on a number of events, with out first briefing the protection minister about it. More not too long ago, it was discovered that even after Gantz expressed his outrage, Shimrit and Toledano continued to fulfill, with the approval of Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi.
Gantz was upset that Kochavi allowed Bennett to go behind his again and set up a direct line of communications with the IDF’s high brass. This tells us that the tense relationship between the prime minister and the protection minister is barely getting worse, and that it could possibly be fairly unstable.
One high official near Gantz instructed Al-Monitor on situation of anonymity that he blames Bennett for deflecting media criticism towards Gantz, in order that it doesn’t deal with his rising listing of failures, chief amongst them the intense mistake of exposing a Mossad operation.
That identical official stated that the actual fact that Gantz is rising within the polls and receiving excessive marks for his efficiency – he’s, the truth is, the most well-liked minister – is why Bennett and different coalition leaders are attempting to harm him. “They have turned him into a punching bag in an attempt to weaken him. They accuse him regularly of wanting to topple the current government and form a coalition with Netanyahu instead. But that’s not true. Gantz made his choice. He is in the coalition. But he will not let them walk all over him.”
This is the temper within the present authorities. While the present coalition is predicted to move the state price range by November, as soon as it will get previous this hurdle, the constituent events will be happy to behave extra independently. Once that occurs, the strain between Gantz and Bennett is prone to worsen.