Islamabad:
The Supreme Court disposed of an intra -court appeal against the showcase notice issued to the Additional Registrar while Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel gave remarks during the hearing. It was also included, will the insulting full court be formed?
A six -member large bench headed by Justice Jamal Mandokhel heard. Lawyer Nazar Abbas said that the contempt of court notice has been withdrawn against my client, the intra -court wants to withdraw the appeal, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel said that you The claim can be withdrawn but the appeal cannot be withdrawn.
If the contempt of court proceedings were terminated, how was the order was given, the decision was also included in the alleged contempt of Chief Justice Pakistan, will the alleged blasphemy be set up, the central case constitutional. The bench is set for hearing.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said that the contempt of court law has stated the whole procedure, the two committees have been held as contempt, the procedure is given first notice, Article 10A for the whole world. Under a transparent trial has the right, is Article 10A not available for judges?
The full court will also include four judges who allegedly insulted, giving us notice. We would have appeared in their court. Justice Shahid Waheed said that in the intercrative appeal, the matter which is not before the court, can we see it, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said that we should also file an intra -court appeal against the decision.
Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel remarked that we listen to the Attorney General, it would be appropriate that the judges should not cross the talk. Justice Athar Manullah said that if this bench wants to continue the proceedings, I will be separated from the bench. There is no case before us. The appeal before us has become ineffective, if the bench continues. If I want, I will apologize.
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that the committee was objected to, tell us can the committee go against the constitution? When the constitutional question comes, the case automatically goes before the constitutional bench, no one has moved the military court case. He moved himself, when the constitutional point will come to me in the regular bench. Will
Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi said that in the January 13 order it was written that the case should be sent to the constitutional bench. Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that what was said in this decision is not a violation of the constitution. What does the Constitution say if a judge violates the constitution? Each judge has sworn in the constitution.
Justice Athar Manullah said that the case before us has become ineffective, can we sit here and notice the judges? We cannot go beyond the hearing of the intra -court appeal. Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that we were told that these two judges should not sit in the bench. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said that it became a new judicial view that my order was not to listen to the judge. Justice Athar Manullah remarked that half such judges could not sit in court. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said. In this case you will have to recruit ad hoc judges.
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that this is so, this is your judge. This is my judge. We should tell us what were our interests. What benefit do we have? At eleven o’clock, when all the courts are closed, we still hear the case, read double files daily.
Justice Musarrat Hilali remarked that we are working doubled in the same salary, Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that on one hand it is said that the beneficiaries are the judges. Will justice go? It will have to be stated that the interests of the interests have been made.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar said that he did not say anything to us and said, “Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that it has been questioned on our good intentions, this matter will have to be cleared. Remarks that the Judges Committee is not a judicial forum, can the committee members object to the matter that their interests are a conflict?
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that the incoming judges want to protect them from contempt of court proceedings, Justice Athar Manullah said that what happened was a shame. At the same time, the Supreme Court disposed of the case, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, Justice Muhammad Ali, Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi and Justice Musarrat Hilali said in the majority decision that the detailed reasons will be released later while Justice Athar Manullah and Justice Shahid Waheed. Giving a minority opinion, the case is with the majority decision to deal with, and the detailed reasons disagree with later issuing.
